Heat pumps are surging in popularity and being hailed as a critical part of the global mission to reach net-zero carbon emissions. But to achieve carbon emission goals, heat pump adoption by consumers has to be rapid, and, as we’ll show in this article, most consumers misunderstand what heat pumps are and what they do, which is slowing adoption.
We conducted a survey of 110 consumers aged 35 – 65 and with incomes between $50K and $250K and found that, because of the name “heat pump,” a large fraction think heat pumps only provide heat, while many others think they’re a different type of completely unrelated device.
This misunderstanding on what heat pumps are — as a result of their unclear name — is likely a key limiting factor that is slowing their adoption. Why? Because purchase decisions on “hidden” utilitarian appliances like furnaces, boilers, and heat pumps are primarily driven by (1) cost and (2) ease. People want to (1) save money on these purchases and (2) have them last a long time, be safe, and in general not give them problems.
We don’t want these hidden utilitarian appliances to be exotic. We want them to be familiar. We want them to be safe. We want them to be low risk. So, the more familiar heat pumps are to consumers, the more likely they are to be adopted.
As a result, an unfamiliar name doesn’t help, it hurts adoption.
The good news is that heat pumps are familiar. They are literally air conditioners that work in both directions. Traditional air conditioners only cool but heat pumps are air conditioners that can also be run “backwards” to heat your space.
So, associating heat pumps with the familiarity and trust we all have with air conditioners can help their adoption. There is nothing controversial about air conditioners. There is nothing unfamiliar about air conditioners. There is nothing risky about air conditioners. We’ve all used and loved air conditioners all our lives, at home, at work, and even in the car.
So, we are proposing that heat pump manufacturers, HVAC installers, governments, and climate organizations start referring to heat pumps as two way air conditioners or 2-way A/Cs for short. It’s a more descriptive, clear, and compelling name than “heat pumps.”
To help test and validate this assertion, we surveyed over 110 consumers and asked the following:
- Have you heard of “heat pumps” before?
- What do you think heat pumps do?
- What do you think a “two way air conditioner” does?
- It turns out there are devices that work just like air conditioners to cool your home, except they can also run in reverse to heat your home. Which name do you find more compelling if you were looking to buy such a device: “heat pump” or “two way air conditioner”?
- Tell us more about your answer in the previous question. Why did you find that one more compelling? What do you think of when you hear either name?
As you’ll see below, the survey results clearly support our case for why heat pumps would indeed benefit from a rebrand.
Key Takeaway: The Name “Heat Pumps” Is Misleading to Consumers
There was one overarching takeaway from our analysis of the survey results: most people do not understand what heat pumps do, and the name is the key reason why.
When asked what they think heat pumps do with an open ended response (not multiple choice) we found that only 13% of respondents answered correctly indicating that heat pumps can both heat and cool a building.
49% described heat pumps as a heating-only device. Here are a sample of some of the responses:
- “Heat the house”
- “Heats air like an air conditioner cools air”
- “Something that pumps heat into a room or something.”
- “They heat a house”
From these responses, it’s clear the name is at fault. “Heat pump” does not imply heating and cooling to the average consumer, it implies only heating.
Furthermore, of the remaining 38% of respondents, we noticed a trend indicating the word “pump” also contributes to the confusion about what heat pumps do.
Specifically, many people described heat pumps as a component part of an HVAC system, furnace, water heater, or some other system. For example:
- “A part of your heating and cooling unit”
- “They power your furnace”
- “They are in the furnace and convert oil to heat”
- “For the water heater”
This is not surprising. The word “pump” sounds like a part — not a standalone system.
Other respondents described heat pumps as some sort of complex or completely unrelated device, including:
- “Thermodynamics, extract heat from a vacuum”
- “It pumps blood around the body at all the time”
- “Shoes with heat warmers”
By analyzing these responses we can see that most people either a) think heat pumps only do heating or b) have no idea what heat pumps do and are just looking at the name and guessing (despite 73% of respondents saying they had heard of heat pumps before). Using a name that accurately describes what a heat pump does is critical to more people understanding what they are.
3X More People Understood What a “Two Way Air Conditioner” Does
In contrast to the responses about what a heat pump does, when asked what they think a “two way air conditioner” does, 46% of respondents described it as a device that can provide both heating and cooling.
With this simple name change – using a term that most people are familiar with – over three times as many respondents correctly answered that this device handles both heating and cooling.
Furthermore, even respondents that said they didn’t know what a two way air conditioner does guessed correctly. For example:
- “I don’t know. Heats and cools”
- “Maybe heat & cool air?”
- “I have no idea. Heats and cools?”
These answers indicate that more people are likely to intuitively understand what a two way air conditioner does, even if they haven’t heard of it before. The same was not true of our respondents when asked what a heat pump does.
Nearly Two Thirds of Respondents Said They Find the Name “Two Way Air Conditioner” More Compelling
When asked which name they find more compelling, 65% of survey respondents (nearly twice as many) answered “two way air conditioner.”
Their reasons why included:
- “because the name indicates that it has more than one function and when I hear the name heat pump, I just think of a unit that only works for heat”
- “Easier to understand”
- “If I hear “heat pump”, I only think of it heating. When I hear “two way air conditioner” I think of it doing both heating and cooling. I do think something more like “2 in 1 conditioner” would be a little easier to understand.”
- “It’s specifically informs without detail of its function”
- “it’s easier to understand for layman”
- “I’m more interested in AC and two way sounds different from what son the market”
- “I feel like it describes it better. the other one just sounds like some kind of plain heater”
Among this sample of reasons we see three key themes that support everything we’ve discussed above:
- The name is easier to understand (less complicated sounding)
- The name implies heating and cooling (instead of just heating)
- The phrase “air conditioner” is extremely familiar and has more positive associations attached to it
The Name “Two Way Air Conditioner” Has Implied Cost Savings (To Most Consumers, “Heat Pumps” Does Not)
Heat pumps have a clear cost advantage over traditional air conditioning units and furnaces because they accomplish what both of those systems do in one unit. But since the name “heat pump” doesn’t come across as a device that does both heating and cooling to most people, as demonstrated above, the potential cost savings isn’t communicated well through the name.
In contrast, because more consumers understand that a “two way air conditioner” does both heating and cooling, the name itself implies built-in cost savings.
Several survey respondents explicitly noted this despite none of the questions in the survey mentioning cost:
- “I like the idea of a dual system to save money”
- “I would hope there would be a savings with combining the two.”
As we mentioned above, large utilitarian purchases such as furnaces and heat pumps are primarily driven by cost and ease. And the name two way air conditioner seems to communicate this cost advantage more effectively.
Calling Heat Pumps “Two Way Air Conditioners” Makes More Sense
If we want to increase adoption rates of heat pumps – this ingenious 2 in 1 invention that provides cost savings, environmental benefits, and literally operates at 300% efficiency (more than 3X that of gas furnaces) – we should start calling them something that people understand and are familiar with.
Almost everyone knows what air conditioning is and has positive associations with it. Even mainstream news outlets use “reverse air conditioners” in their articles to describe heat pumps. And as we found in our survey, over 3X as many people understood what a “two way air conditioner” does compared to a “heat pump.”
For all of these reasons, we are proposing that heat pump manufacturers, HVAC installers, governments, and climate organizations start referring to heat pumps as two way air conditioners or 2-way A/Cs for short.
If you agree, share this article to spread the word. Particularly if you’re compelled by the relevance of heat pumps for curbing climate change, the faster we begin rebranding heat pumps, the better off we will be.
Learn More About Heat Pumps
Interested to learn more about heat pumps? Here are some of our foundational articles on these devices for further reading: